There's always been this debate on some of my classes at college (I study litearture), and surely out there too, on whether is it better the book or the movie adaptation of it. I know that a lot of people prefer reading te book, like me, and others might prefer watching the movie they've done about it, others may argue that it depends on how the book and the adaptation is (that's why I put the 'depends' option in the poll). So, i would like to hear your opinions on the subject, and as the thread rules establish, don't just vote and say 'i voted this', disscuss your vote and why you prefer either one.

As for me, like I said, I prefer reading the book for a couple of reasons. First, when you start picturing the story in your head, you can imagine any sort of things, or you can picture what is being described in yor own mannr, taste and preferences, but when you watch the adaptation, yor view of the story is limited to waht is being portrayed by the director, and how it's being portrayed; your imagination is being limited, so to speak. Also, as has been discussed in another thread, movies sometimes leave out of the movie key parts of the story that were on the book, and at least to me, this is something bad, it kinda takes out part of the 'magic' of the book.
The thread is yours, people!