Metal Storm logo
Metal Elitism - Elitism Of The Genre Over Others



Posts: 98   Visited by: 220 users

Original post

Posted by Zealot644, 25.08.2011 - 02:22
I've been a fan of metal for quite a few years now. Ever since I was younger I have simply found it to be the best sounding music because of the talent required and how it typically is filled with deep and insightful meanings within each song. I'm young at the age of 17 so I cant really call myself an experienced metal listener even though I do know a fair amount about it. I mean hell...Until the age of I think 9 or 10 I remember those days I thought Simple Plan and Blink 182 were the most heavy stuff I'd ever hear but then I ran into Lamb Of God and All That Remains and was then propelled into metal and I cant say I'd ever look back.

Nowadays I'll listen to almost any subgenre of metal with my favorite's being Death Metal, Melodic Death Metal, and Djent if you consider it a subgenre ^^ and then my earlier years favorite of Metalcore now sitting along the bottom because it has been 'mainstreamed' through the overabundance of scene bands nowadays. Either way I'll listen and appreciate prettymuch every subgenre of metal (even though subgenres are kinda silly...it helps you find what you want in the very expansive styles of Metal ^^)


I try and keep myself as open minded as possible and I try and consider many different facts about various things in life. Dont get me started on religion, space, history, psychology, or any other in depth topic that has many explanations of points of view... I love those. Anyways, I have tried to get myself to like so much music over the years from many different genres (Prettymuch heard it all) but I just cant seem to find the reasons that anyone would like 99% of music outside of metal even when I try my hardest to appreciate the talent and work behind it. I know I just stated I like to stay open minded but with music I find this impossible. Every time I hear a song on the radio (Gotta love mom's and sisters who eat that garbage up) I cringe at how awful it is because every single song is about love/drugs/money/girls/cheating/etc and nothing ever changes. It's always the same typical lyrics and style with a CHART TOPPING HIT that lasts about a week before the next big thing rolls in. I mean do NONE of the listeners of mainstream music ever think for themselves and realize "Wow, this sounds like the chart topper last week. I swear they have the same everything" ... *NEW HIT SINGLE FEAT. INSERT GENERIC RAP ARTIST HERE*. Ugh. I hate mainstream the most because it hasnt been original since 20+ years ago (Huge thanks to MTV and the likes for putting it in the state it is in) because music has degenerated from Musical Talent > to > Stage Presence And Appeal. Do you look good and have zero original talent? Get rich with making another autotuned single.

It's the same story with Rap. Or Indie music (Alternative as they like to call their awful hipster crud). Country. Electronic. Whatever other genres really...

None of them work towards coming up with something new and original. Filled with hollow and dry lyrics. Metal isnt entirely free of songs that are pointless...some of those are the best, but I think that when your entire 'genre' is composed of emptiness there is something wrong. It loses the thing that makes it music. Music is hard to define really but I feel some of the agreed definitions are about how it is an expression (Of the soul even) and a representation of a persons talent with their voice or instruments. I find 99% of music past Metal to require next to nothing in terms of these skills. While there are many people in other genres who are talented at either or both it doesnt compare anywhere close to Metal.

Anyways...I figure because music is such a personal thing that it is the reason behind me feeling Metal>All but I cannot find any reasons why other music could be considered better in any way. The only exception to this is various ambient music (Sort of like http://www.heavyblogisheavy.com/2011/08/11/in-space-no-one-can-hear-you-scream-but-they-sure-as-hell-can-hear-you-rock/) that I see pop up from time to time on metal websites. Metal just has the largest variety of sounds and individual talent than any of the other genres combined. The only 100% of the time true exception to this would be true Classical music.

As much as I hate to be ignorant and beat my chest yelling "MY MUSIC IS THE BEST" can you really disagree with me that Metal....is?
25.08.2011 - 22:39
Glaucus

Well. Metal is pretty friggin' awesome, that much I know for certain.

But, Metal totally isn't the only genre I listen to, just preferred.

I think the point has already been made earlier in the thread, but music is music. It's there for people to enjoy no matter how 'fake' or 'worthless' it can be. Every genre has its high points and low points, and those are defined differently by each person. Sure, we can bash genres that we don't like, but no matter how horrid or awful it seems to be, it's always best to keep in mind that the music of that genre was created by people who (hopefully) love what they do, and their fans love them for it. A fraction of grudging respect is better than complete indifference.
----
"Pretty easy work, for a God." - Freya ~ Valkyrie Profile
Loading...
25.08.2011 - 22:50
IronAngel

Many valid points have been made. There is certainly nothing objectively special in metal that would set it apart from other genres in terms of prowess, dedication, diversity or whatever.

I still want to emphasize one point: Zealot talks about chart topping hits as if they were representative of their respective genres and equal competitors to his favorite death metal bands. But that's just setting up a straw man: everyone who's into music knows that chart hits are generally intentionally manufactured by the music industry with no artistic ambitions in mind, and I really doubt any fan of rap or country would refute that. Chart music has certain traits that are not dependent on or representative of genres. The latest pop diva, rapper or rock star that gets an abundance of airtime is rarely connected to any musical scene of their respective genre. The world of chart music and radioplay, and the dedicated music scenes of any genre, are two different worlds. These worlds overlap from time to time in certain artists, but you can't make any conclusions about one based on observing the other. This holds true for metal just as well. There is plenty of marketable, easy and unambitious metal out there, bands that give elitistic metalheads no reason to be proud. I'm not talking about any specific genre, like metalcore or nu metal, but rather the most marketable, visible bands of any genre. Don't tell me you can't name a single manufactured, commercially-inclined chart band in power metal, thrash metal, death metal, black metal or even doom?

The thing is, chart music is generally bad by virtue of being chart music. Well, it's not bad because many people enjoy it, but it has different aspirations and standards than artistically ambitious music. This has nothing to do with genres. Chart metal, chart rap, chart pop, chart country and chart electornica all exist, and certainly don't respresent their entire respective genres.

Personally, I can name one album (actually several, but w/e) in rap, country, electronica, jazz, modern classical, ambient, folk, indie pop, garage, post-hardcore, metal, and a handful of other genres, released this year 2011, that has blown my mind or at least given me a lot of enjoyment. All these genres have their innovators, musical geniuses, professionals, and saying otherwise just shows how little you know. But to be honest, I couldn't give a rat's ass about innovation or musical longevity: if I enjoy a good album once, I'm happy it exists. Even if it turns out to be nothing special upon closer inspection, it's given me a good time. That's enough.
Loading...
25.08.2011 - 23:21
psykometal
A staff guy...
Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 25.08.2011 at 14:51

Written by Guest on 25.08.2011 at 14:35

Written by X-Ray Rod on 25.08.2011 at 14:32


This may be off topic, but "90s: The Fall Of Thrash" would be an awesome title for a documentary.

A good follow up to the documentary in my signature

Agreed
----
~Zep, Database and Forum Moderation~

Loading...
26.08.2011 - 17:38
FREDD
Account deleted
I believe I'm a few steps away from to "not giving a rat's ass." 2 or 3 years ago I would have been all "Oh yea! metal rules! it takes real skill! the creative shit!" but now when I try to think about it, that I've randomly listened to more styles of music than I care to remember, seen the devotion of their fanbases, and even seen the anti-music religious folks, I realise that I'm too tired and hungry to think. I just like metal more than other styles, some people like other styles more than metal and some dont like music at all. fair enough. can i fucking eat now?
Loading...
27.08.2011 - 13:30
Zombie94

Written by IronAngel on 25.08.2011 at 22:50

Don't tell me you can't name a single manufactured, commercially-inclined chart band in power metal, thrash metal, death metal, black metal or even doom?




Well no, actually, I can't think of one time I've ever heard black metal or death metal on radio, let alone mainstream radio. There's still metal bands that are trying to appeal to a certain demographic for commercial gains (BFMV, A7X, BMTH, Disturbed etc. etc.), but not to the extent of any of the pop, rap, hip hop or R&B acts I'm subjected to hearing every day getting airtime on the radio. I refuse to believe that extreme metal will ever acquire mainstream acceptance; it's just too alien in melody, rhythm and general sound to anything most people are used to hearing. Even bands that could hardly be considered extreme in sound like Slipknot or Disturbed are shunned and generalised by maintream listeners. So I see no way for something as acquired a taste as black or death metal to catch on, even in its most watered down and commercialised forms.
Loading...
27.08.2011 - 17:16
vezzy
Stallmanite
You don't need much skill at all to do a generic death metal or any metal album, really.

For example Slaughter, while a raw band, initially started off as a joke. They could barely play their instruments and their songs are simple, in a kind of punk fashion.
----
Licensed under the GPLv3.
Relinquish proprietary software for a greater GNU/America.
Loading...
27.08.2011 - 19:47
Scorpyin

Except the masses of people are incredibly stupid, so it only makes sence that radio would play stupid music to appeal to the masses. Sure if the radio played metal, the world COULD become a little more enlightened and appreciate a more progressive sound (instead of goin backwards and using autotune and drum machines, ugh!). But the average idiot doesn't want to hear about how their country sucks and the government is slowly killing free will. They'd rather hear about dancing in the club and making money from the shitty single you're currently listening to (which to me is almost insulting), because they too, are idiots. Just be glad you posses the intellect to recognize sometihng great when its presented to you. (I'm also not saying anything other than metal sucks, there may be other good songs out there... I've just yet to hear them hahahaha!!)
Loading...
27.08.2011 - 20:36
Introspekrieg
Totemic Lust
I know incredibly smart people that listen to the "backwards" stuff on the radio... musical taste has no correlation with intellect.

If you want to feel special, have your mommy rub some vaseline on your heinie...
Loading...
27.08.2011 - 21:02
Zealot644

Written by Introspekrieg on 27.08.2011 at 20:36

If you want to feel special, have your mommy rub some vaseline on your heinie...


I'm confused. Does that make -you- feel special or something o.o?
Loading...
27.08.2011 - 21:10
Introspekrieg
Totemic Lust
Written by Zealot644 on 27.08.2011 at 21:02

Written by Introspekrieg on 27.08.2011 at 20:36

If you want to feel special, have your mommy rub some vaseline on your heinie...


I'm confused. Does that make -you- feel special or something o.o?


Always does

(It was an Anchorman reference)

P.S. There are plenty of metal bands that use studio production tricks and drum machines...
Loading...
28.08.2011 - 01:29
FREDD
Account deleted
Written by Introspekrieg on 27.08.2011 at 20:36

I know incredibly smart people that listen to the "backwards" stuff on the radio... musical taste has no correlation with intellect.

If you want to feel special, have your mommy rub some vaseline on your heinie...

I laughed, without knowing the reference.
Loading...
28.08.2011 - 01:44
JCJen7

Written by Zombie94 on 27.08.2011 at 13:30


There's still metal bands that are trying to appeal to a certain demographic for commercial gains (BFMV, A7X, BMTH, Disturbed etc. etc.), but not to the extent of any of the pop, rap, hip hop or R&B acts I'm subjected to hearing every day getting airtime on the radio.


I have a bit of a problem with a statement like this, considering that you have absolutely no idea what those bands are trying to do. I mean, the only band I really listen to there is Avenged Sevenfold, but, as a fan, I would not say they are doing this only for the money. And exactly what demographic would that be? Because I am a teenager (probably what you were referring to) but if I play Avenged Sevenfold for my dad (a rock n roll fan) or one of my friends (mainly rap fans) they would certainly enjoy it more than if I showed them some lesser known black metal band. Avenged Sevenfold is simply not that extreme of music. They have very nice melodies, catchy riffs, and their songs are engineered to sound pleasing, but that doesn't necessarily mean that they are engineered to make money. I personally believe those guys love making music, they have hit lows (losing their drummer), been openly very emotional about it, and basically tributed an entire album to him. They have also hit highs, (Nightmare topping charts at no. 1), but it bothers me that people think of them as just corporate machines that churn out assembly line metal to make money. When in fact, they are musical artists. Musical artists that many people enjoy, even a very devote metalhead like myself. And they are people too, who despite have seen the very lows of the jobs they have, have continued to make music. Maybe because they want money. But maybe, maybe because they like it.

Written by Zombie94 on 27.08.2011 at 13:30

So I see no way for something as acquired a taste as black or death metal to catch on, even in its most watered down and commercialised forms.



Thats irrelevant. No one was saying anything about black or death becoming "popular" in terms of selling millions, and getting radio play. but simply, becoming less ambitious musically to sell more units.
----
This is my sig, respect it. Please.

CHECK THESE OUT
Loading...
28.08.2011 - 11:40
IronAngel

Written by Zombie94 on 27.08.2011 at 13:30

Written by IronAngel on 25.08.2011 at 22:50

Don't tell me you can't name a single manufactured, commercially-inclined chart band in power metal, thrash metal, death metal, black metal or even doom?




Well no, actually, I can't think of one time I've ever heard black metal or death metal on radio, let alone mainstream radio. There's still metal bands that are trying to appeal to a certain demographic for commercial gains (BFMV, A7X, BMTH, Disturbed etc. etc.), but not to the extent of any of the pop, rap, hip hop or R&B acts I'm subjected to hearing every day getting airtime on the radio. I refuse to believe that extreme metal will ever acquire mainstream acceptance; it's just too alien in melody, rhythm and general sound to anything most people are used to hearing. Even bands that could hardly be considered extreme in sound like Slipknot or Disturbed are shunned and generalised by maintream listeners. So I see no way for something as acquired a taste as black or death metal to catch on, even in its most watered down and commercialised forms.


There's a mighty leap of logic here: because metal isn't quite as successful and popular than some other genre, it must be more artistically ambitious. You really seem to be saying that metal doesn't reach top positions in single charts because it's not commercial. It's funny that I never see a metalhead making the more plausible (though probably no more correct) conclusion instead: metal isn't as successful because it's just not good enough. That would be logical. You're just making excuses for the relative obscurity of metal.

I don't know how it is in Ireland, but in Finland big metal releases end up on the album sales chart by default. New Megadeth was on 24/7 when it came out, and I've heard pretty much every subgenre of metal played on the radio at some point or another. It's not to the extent that happens in some other genres, but that isn't the point. Around here, metal certainly isn't "shunned" in the mainstream. This testifies that metal's obscurity is not inherent in the (supposedly more "extreme") music itself but the musical culture of society.

Maybe "chart band" was a poor choice of words, but I was referring to the kind of bands I described: manufactured, commercially-inclined, lacking in true artistic ambition and innovation. Don't be fooled by the self-satisfaction of the metalhead community: they're still an impressionable target demographic to whom labels market their newest investments. Just because metal bands are marketed at a smaller demographic than some R&B artists doesn't make them more artistic. Why do you think labels pick up and promote most new bands? Not because their trained ears hear something artistic in them, but because their experience in their job tells them that this band is marketable.

Written by Scorpyin on 27.08.2011 at 19:47

Except the masses of people are incredibly stupid, so it only makes sence that radio would play stupid music to appeal to the masses. Sure if the radio played metal, the world COULD become a little more enlightened and appreciate a more progressive sound (instead of goin backwards and using autotune and drum machines, ugh!). But the average idiot doesn't want to hear about how their country sucks and the government is slowly killing free will. They'd rather hear about dancing in the club and making money from the shitty single you're currently listening to (which to me is almost insulting), because they too, are idiots. Just be glad you posses the intellect to recognize sometihng great when its presented to you. (I'm also not saying anything other than metal sucks, there may be other good songs out there... I've just yet to hear them hahahaha!!)


Not sure what radio stations you've been listening, but around here many of my favorite artists are played on the radio. Some of them (like the Finnish PMMP) even top the charts. I just heard Kate Bush's Wuthering Heights at work the other day, and I can't name many metal songs that are as brilliant as that perfect pop song. And without bragging, I can say it's pretty likely that I am smarter than you (because statistically, I am pretty fucking smart). You do have some whiff of a good point in there: musical competence probably does play part in what you enjoy. It's not about intelligence, but it's not purely about arbitrary taste either. Tastes are acquired, and it's a fact that music has varying degrees of transparency, originality, musical prowess, and different times have different standards for good music, etc. A casual listener might enjoy something a music buff (a fan of any genre) would consider rather banal. But that means the music has a different target demographic and serves a different purpose. It has nothing to do with these people being too dumb to recognize the greatness of non-mainstream music, but simply that their level of musical competence is such that they are still able to enjoy their casual listening habits. They don't need the pretentious wankery that's so necessary for us jaded music buffs to get our kicks these days. I don't see what's so admirable in our loss of innocense. Personally, I miss the times when everything sounded new and great.
Loading...
28.08.2011 - 11:58
whatsacow

Just at the opening paragraph: While I love metal, I must say the vast majority of metal is very generic. Look at all the death metal bands who sound exactly the fucking same. So, while I believe that metal has some pretty amazing talent behind it, it's largely very unoriginal. Even Prog metal, which is supposed to be about pushing the genre further, all sounds the same. But in every genre, there are always bands who are very different from the norm. For Rap take a look at cLOUDDEAD, a rap group who put as much emphasis into creating a mood and soundscaping as they do on their lyrics. For Pop, look at that... whats her name? The one who did "Last day on Earth?" Well, while that song is very generic and (for lack of better words) shit, the rest of her music merges pop, rock and opera in a very cool way.
While I love metal (hence why I am on this site almost every day), it isn't the most original genre out there - just the most awesome
----
When God made up the golden rule, do you think he noticed that it condones rape?
Loading...
28.08.2011 - 15:16
FREDD
Account deleted
Written by whatsacow on 28.08.2011 at 11:58

Just at the opening paragraph: While I love metal, I must say the vast majority of metal is very generic. Look at all the death metal bands who sound exactly the fucking same. So, while I believe that metal has some pretty amazing talent behind it, it's largely very unoriginal. Even Prog metal, which is supposed to be about pushing the genre further, all sounds the same. But in every genre, there are always bands who are very different from the norm. For Rap take a look at cLOUDDEAD, a rap group who put as much emphasis into creating a mood and soundscaping as they do on their lyrics. For Pop, look at that... whats her name? The one who did "Last day on Earth?" Well, while that song is very generic and (for lack of better words) shit, the rest of her music merges pop, rock and opera in a very cool way.
While I love metal (hence why I am on this site almost every day), it isn't the most original genre out there - just the most awesome

I agree. I was going to write something similar to this, but I'm too lazy. I'm not even going to complete thi
Loading...
29.08.2011 - 00:47
Zombie94

Written by JCJen7 on 28.08.2011 at 01:44

Written by Zombie94 on 27.08.2011 at 13:30


There's still metal bands that are trying to appeal to a certain demographic for commercial gains (BFMV, A7X, BMTH, Disturbed etc. etc.), but not to the extent of any of the pop, rap, hip hop or R&B acts I'm subjected to hearing every day getting airtime on the radio.


I have a bit of a problem with a statement like this, considering that you have absolutely no idea what those bands are trying to do. I mean, the only band I really listen to there is Avenged Sevenfold, but, as a fan, I would not say they are doing this only for the money. And exactly what demographic would that be? Because I am a teenager (probably what you were referring to) but if I play Avenged Sevenfold for my dad (a rock n roll fan) or one of my friends (mainly rap fans) they would certainly enjoy it more than if I showed them some lesser known black metal band. Avenged Sevenfold is simply not that extreme of music. They have very nice melodies, catchy riffs, and their songs are engineered to sound pleasing, but that doesn't necessarily mean that they are engineered to make money. I personally believe those guys love making music, they have hit lows (losing their drummer), been openly very emotional about it, and basically tributed an entire album to him. They have also hit highs, (Nightmare topping charts at no. 1), but it bothers me that people think of them as just corporate machines that churn out assembly line metal to make money. When in fact, they are musical artists. Musical artists that many people enjoy, even a very devote metalhead like myself. And they are people too, who despite have seen the very lows of the jobs they have, have continued to make music. Maybe because they want money. But maybe, maybe because they like it.

Written by Zombie94 on 27.08.2011 at 13:30

So I see no way for something as acquired a taste as black or death metal to catch on, even in its most watered down and commercialised forms.



Thats irrelevant. No one was saying anything about black or death becoming "popular" in terms of selling millions, and getting radio play. but simply, becoming less ambitious musically to sell more units.


Avenged Sevenfold play music that appeals to the casual music listener. I'm not saying they're not good musicians, I am saying that their music is dumbed down, especially lyrically. As for the demographic I was talking about, it had nothing to do with age. I'm talking about how those bands appeal to the same demographic of people I see walking down the street wearing a BMTH t shirt with straightened black hair. Your dad and rap fans would enjoy it because it's not an extreme form of metal, such as the black and death metal bands I was referring to. Funny that Nightmare, perhaps one of their worst albums to date, is now at number 1. The charts are determined by the tastes of casual music listeners who don't have the patience or interest in music to delve any deeper than the newest catchy single the radio spoonfeeds them. A7X are musical artists? Of course they are, so is anyone who picks up an instrument and plays a song. It doesn't mean I have to respect them. I really don't see what you're arguing here. If you enjoy A7X then that's your taste, but i feel that if they are as talented as you say then they're certainly playing at only a tenth of what they're capable of cus what i'm hearing (especially with the new album) is weak.
Loading...
29.08.2011 - 00:56
Zombie94

Written by IronAngel on 28.08.2011 at 11:40

Written by Zombie94 on 27.08.2011 at 13:30

Written by IronAngel on 25.08.2011 at 22:50

Don't tell me you can't name a single manufactured, commercially-inclined chart band in power metal, thrash metal, death metal, black metal or even doom?




Well no, actually, I can't think of one time I've ever heard black metal or death metal on radio, let alone mainstream radio. There's still metal bands that are trying to appeal to a certain demographic for commercial gains (BFMV, A7X, BMTH, Disturbed etc. etc.), but not to the extent of any of the pop, rap, hip hop or R&B acts I'm subjected to hearing every day getting airtime on the radio. I refuse to believe that extreme metal will ever acquire mainstream acceptance; it's just too alien in melody, rhythm and general sound to anything most people are used to hearing. Even bands that could hardly be considered extreme in sound like Slipknot or Disturbed are shunned and generalised by maintream listeners. So I see no way for something as acquired a taste as black or death metal to catch on, even in its most watered down and commercialised forms.


There's a mighty leap of logic here: because metal isn't quite as successful and popular than some other genre, it must be more artistically ambitious. You really seem to be saying that metal doesn't reach top positions in single charts because it's not commercial. It's funny that I never see a metalhead making the more plausible (though probably no more correct) conclusion instead: metal isn't as successful because it's just not good enough. That would be logical. You're just making excuses for the relative obscurity of metal.

I don't know how it is in Ireland, but in Finland big metal releases end up on the album sales chart by default. New Megadeth was on 24/7 when it came out, and I've heard pretty much every subgenre of metal played on the radio at some point or another. It's not to the extent that happens in some other genres, but that isn't the point. Around here, metal certainly isn't "shunned" in the mainstream. This testifies that metal's obscurity is not inherent in the (supposedly more "extreme") music itself but the musical culture of society.

Maybe "chart band" was a poor choice of words, but I was referring to the kind of bands I described: manufactured, commercially-inclined, lacking in true artistic ambition and innovation. Don't be fooled by the self-satisfaction of the metalhead community: they're still an impressionable target demographic to whom labels market their newest investments. Just because metal bands are marketed at a smaller demographic than some R&B artists doesn't make them more artistic. Why do you think labels pick up and promote most new bands? Not because their trained ears hear something artistic in them, but because their experience in their job tells them that this band is marketable.

Written by Scorpyin on 27.08.2011 at 19:47

Except the masses of people are incredibly stupid, so it only makes sence that radio would play stupid music to appeal to the masses. Sure if the radio played metal, the world COULD become a little more enlightened and appreciate a more progressive sound (instead of goin backwards and using autotune and drum machines, ugh!). But the average idiot doesn't want to hear about how their country sucks and the government is slowly killing free will. They'd rather hear about dancing in the club and making money from the shitty single you're currently listening to (which to me is almost insulting), because they too, are idiots. Just be glad you posses the intellect to recognize sometihng great when its presented to you. (I'm also not saying anything other than metal sucks, there may be other good songs out there... I've just yet to hear them hahahaha!!)


Not sure what radio stations you've been listening, but around here many of my favorite artists are played on the radio. Some of them (like the Finnish PMMP) even top the charts. I just heard Kate Bush's Wuthering Heights at work the other day, and I can't name many metal songs that are as brilliant as that perfect pop song. And without bragging, I can say it's pretty likely that I am smarter than you (because statistically, I am pretty fucking smart). You do have some whiff of a good point in there: musical competence probably does play part in what you enjoy. It's not about intelligence, but it's not purely about arbitrary taste either. Tastes are acquired, and it's a fact that music has varying degrees of transparency, originality, musical prowess, and different times have different standards for good music, etc. A casual listener might enjoy something a music buff (a fan of any genre) would consider rather banal. But that means the music has a different target demographic and serves a different purpose. It has nothing to do with these people being too dumb to recognize the greatness of non-mainstream music, but simply that their level of musical competence is such that they are still able to enjoy their casual listening habits. They don't need the pretentious wankery that's so necessary for us jaded music buffs to get our kicks these days. I don't see what's so admirable in our loss of innocense. Personally, I miss the times when everything sounded new and great.


Well I'll tell you how it is in Ireland then. Metal does not get played. End of.
Loading...
29.08.2011 - 05:42
whatsacow

Written by Zombie94 on 29.08.2011 at 00:47

Written by JCJen7 on 28.08.2011 at 01:44

Written by Zombie94 on 27.08.2011 at 13:30


There's still metal bands that are trying to appeal to a certain demographic for commercial gains (BFMV, A7X, BMTH, Disturbed etc. etc.), but not to the extent of any of the pop, rap, hip hop or R&B acts I'm subjected to hearing every day getting airtime on the radio.


I have a bit of a problem with a statement like this, considering that you have absolutely no idea what those bands are trying to do. I mean, the only band I really listen to there is Avenged Sevenfold, but, as a fan, I would not say they are doing this only for the money. And exactly what demographic would that be? Because I am a teenager (probably what you were referring to) but if I play Avenged Sevenfold for my dad (a rock n roll fan) or one of my friends (mainly rap fans) they would certainly enjoy it more than if I showed them some lesser known black metal band. Avenged Sevenfold is simply not that extreme of music. They have very nice melodies, catchy riffs, and their songs are engineered to sound pleasing, but that doesn't necessarily mean that they are engineered to make money. I personally believe those guys love making music, they have hit lows (losing their drummer), been openly very emotional about it, and basically tributed an entire album to him. They have also hit highs, (Nightmare topping charts at no. 1), but it bothers me that people think of them as just corporate machines that churn out assembly line metal to make money. When in fact, they are musical artists. Musical artists that many people enjoy, even a very devote metalhead like myself. And they are people too, who despite have seen the very lows of the jobs they have, have continued to make music. Maybe because they want money. But maybe, maybe because they like it.

Written by Zombie94 on 27.08.2011 at 13:30

So I see no way for something as acquired a taste as black or death metal to catch on, even in its most watered down and commercialised forms.



Thats irrelevant. No one was saying anything about black or death becoming "popular" in terms of selling millions, and getting radio play. but simply, becoming less ambitious musically to sell more units.


Avenged Sevenfold play music that appeals to the casual music listener. I'm not saying they're not good musicians, I am saying that their music is dumbed down, especially lyrically. As for the demographic I was talking about, it had nothing to do with age. I'm talking about how those bands appeal to the same demographic of people I see walking down the street wearing a BMTH t shirt with straightened black hair. Your dad and rap fans would enjoy it because it's not an extreme form of metal, such as the black and death metal bands I was referring to. Funny that Nightmare, perhaps one of their worst albums to date, is now at number 1. The charts are determined by the tastes of casual music listeners who don't have the patience or interest in music to delve any deeper than the newest catchy single the radio spoonfeeds them. A7X are musical artists? Of course they are, so is anyone who picks up an instrument and plays a song. It doesn't mean I have to respect them. I really don't see what you're arguing here. If you enjoy A7X then that's your taste, but i feel that if they are as talented as you say then they're certainly playing at only a tenth of what they're capable of cus what i'm hearing (especially with the new album) is weak.

Just because something is accessible does not mean it is a cash grab. They might just like the music they play. Look at something like nirvana. Quite accessible and yet Cobaine never wanted the fame or wealth. He just loved music.
----
When God made up the golden rule, do you think he noticed that it condones rape?
Loading...
29.08.2011 - 11:49
vezzy
Stallmanite
Written by Scorpyin on 27.08.2011 at 19:47
(I'm also not saying anything other than metal sucks, there may be other good songs out there... I've just yet to hear them hahahaha!!)


Apparently you haven't heard of any other musical genres at all besides metal and pop.
----
Licensed under the GPLv3.
Relinquish proprietary software for a greater GNU/America.
Loading...
29.08.2011 - 21:57
Zombie94

Written by whatsacow on 29.08.2011 at 05:42

Written by Zombie94 on 29.08.2011 at 00:47

Written by JCJen7 on 28.08.2011 at 01:44

Written by Zombie94 on 27.08.2011 at 13:30


There's still metal bands that are trying to appeal to a certain demographic for commercial gains (BFMV, A7X, BMTH, Disturbed etc. etc.), but not to the extent of any of the pop, rap, hip hop or R&B acts I'm subjected to hearing every day getting airtime on the radio.


I have a bit of a problem with a statement like this, considering that you have absolutely no idea what those bands are trying to do. I mean, the only band I really listen to there is Avenged Sevenfold, but, as a fan, I would not say they are doing this only for the money. And exactly what demographic would that be? Because I am a teenager (probably what you were referring to) but if I play Avenged Sevenfold for my dad (a rock n roll fan) or one of my friends (mainly rap fans) they would certainly enjoy it more than if I showed them some lesser known black metal band. Avenged Sevenfold is simply not that extreme of music. They have very nice melodies, catchy riffs, and their songs are engineered to sound pleasing, but that doesn't necessarily mean that they are engineered to make money. I personally believe those guys love making music, they have hit lows (losing their drummer), been openly very emotional about it, and basically tributed an entire album to him. They have also hit highs, (Nightmare topping charts at no. 1), but it bothers me that people think of them as just corporate machines that churn out assembly line metal to make money. When in fact, they are musical artists. Musical artists that many people enjoy, even a very devote metalhead like myself. And they are people too, who despite have seen the very lows of the jobs they have, have continued to make music. Maybe because they want money. But maybe, maybe because they like it.

Written by Zombie94 on 27.08.2011 at 13:30

So I see no way for something as acquired a taste as black or death metal to catch on, even in its most watered down and commercialised forms.



Thats irrelevant. No one was saying anything about black or death becoming "popular" in terms of selling millions, and getting radio play. but simply, becoming less ambitious musically to sell more units.


Avenged Sevenfold play music that appeals to the casual music listener. I'm not saying they're not good musicians, I am saying that their music is dumbed down, especially lyrically. As for the demographic I was talking about, it had nothing to do with age. I'm talking about how those bands appeal to the same demographic of people I see walking down the street wearing a BMTH t shirt with straightened black hair. Your dad and rap fans would enjoy it because it's not an extreme form of metal, such as the black and death metal bands I was referring to. Funny that Nightmare, perhaps one of their worst albums to date, is now at number 1. The charts are determined by the tastes of casual music listeners who don't have the patience or interest in music to delve any deeper than the newest catchy single the radio spoonfeeds them. A7X are musical artists? Of course they are, so is anyone who picks up an instrument and plays a song. It doesn't mean I have to respect them. I really don't see what you're arguing here. If you enjoy A7X then that's your taste, but i feel that if they are as talented as you say then they're certainly playing at only a tenth of what they're capable of cus what i'm hearing (especially with the new album) is weak.

Just because something is accessible does not mean it is a cash grab. They might just like the music they play. Look at something like nirvana. Quite accessible and yet Cobaine never wanted the fame or wealth. He just loved music.


Accessibility is completely subjective. There's some Nirvana songs that are harsher sounding than anything A7X have produced.
Loading...
29.08.2011 - 22:12
Doc G.
Full Grown Hoser
Also A7X is largely an amalgamation of the most easily digestible aspects of Metallica and Guns N Roses. That's why it's hard to view it as anything but a cash grab.
----
"I got a lot of really good ideas, problem is, most of them suck."
- George Carlin
Loading...
29.08.2011 - 23:23
Zealot644

Written by Doc G. on 29.08.2011 at 22:12

Also A7X is largely an amalgamation of the most easily digestible aspects of Metallica and Guns N Roses. That's why it's hard to view it as anything but a cash grab.


Dont get me started on how much I hate that band lol >.>
Loading...
30.08.2011 - 14:36
whatsacow

Written by Doc G. on 29.08.2011 at 22:12

Also A7X is largely an amalgamation of the most easily digestible aspects of Metallica and Guns N Roses. That's why it's hard to view it as anything but a cash grab.

I'm not a fan of the music either, however I must repeat myself. Maybe A7X like Metallica and GnR and wanted to merge the sounds together. Maybe thats just the style of music they like to play. It does not mean its a cash grab. I think if I was into that style of music, I'd make something similar just because I like the sound of the music.
----
When God made up the golden rule, do you think he noticed that it condones rape?
Loading...
31.08.2011 - 02:33
JCJen7

Written by whatsacow on 30.08.2011 at 14:36

Written by Doc G. on 29.08.2011 at 22:12

Also A7X is largely an amalgamation of the most easily digestible aspects of Metallica and Guns N Roses. That's why it's hard to view it as anything but a cash grab.

I'm not a fan of the music either, however I must repeat myself. Maybe A7X like Metallica and GnR and wanted to merge the sounds together. Maybe thats just the style of music they like to play. It does not mean its a cash grab. I think if I was into that style of music, I'd make something similar just because I like the sound of the music.


That is spot on of what I was trying to say. YES, their music does make money. However, maybe that's the music they like. What if in some other dimension, everyone loves raw black metal, and all these kvlt bands here are rockstars there, and get called sellouts, while a7x are unpopular, and are therefore considered to be doing it only for the love of the music.

Does the style of music that society loves really determine if a band is making music to make music, or for money? I find that incredibly shallow, and a simplistic view on a set of musician's personal goals and values. In addition to being offensive to their fans, saying that they are simply crowds of consumers mindlessly buying what sounds nice. Personally, my a7x CD's get played just as much as my death metal and thrash metal stuff.
----
This is my sig, respect it. Please.

CHECK THESE OUT
Loading...
31.08.2011 - 04:59
whatsacow

Written by JCJen7 on 31.08.2011 at 02:33

Written by whatsacow on 30.08.2011 at 14:36

Written by Doc G. on 29.08.2011 at 22:12

Also A7X is largely an amalgamation of the most easily digestible aspects of Metallica and Guns N Roses. That's why it's hard to view it as anything but a cash grab.

I'm not a fan of the music either, however I must repeat myself. Maybe A7X like Metallica and GnR and wanted to merge the sounds together. Maybe thats just the style of music they like to play. It does not mean its a cash grab. I think if I was into that style of music, I'd make something similar just because I like the sound of the music.


That is spot on of what I was trying to say. YES, their music does make money. However, maybe that's the music they like. What if in some other dimension, everyone loves raw black metal, and all these kvlt bands here are rockstars there, and get called sellouts, while a7x are unpopular, and are therefore considered to be doing it only for the love of the music.

Does the style of music that society loves really determine if a band is making music to make music, or for money? I find that incredibly shallow, and a simplistic view on a set of musician's personal goals and values. In addition to being offensive to their fans, saying that they are simply crowds of consumers mindlessly buying what sounds nice. Personally, my a7x CD's get played just as much as my death metal and thrash metal stuff.

Exactly. Metal to me is about individualism, being different, and expressing yourself. So i find it kind of dodgy that if you like something popular, if you go against the grain of metal society, you are outcast. Honest to god, I really don't like A7X. They are annoying and just dont fit my tastes. But if you like them, or even someone as terrible as Limp Bizkit, who am I to say you're wrong. If you like that music, so be it. Some people only listen to a band when it is popular to do so. I would see them as mindless consumers. But say you've stuck with... Linkin Park (just an example) even when everyones saying "Linkin Park was soooo 2004" (or whenever they released their albums), I would consider you a legitimate fan and would not question it.
----
When God made up the golden rule, do you think he noticed that it condones rape?
Loading...
31.08.2011 - 13:20
Doc G.
Full Grown Hoser
Written by JCJen7 on 31.08.2011 at 02:33

Written by whatsacow on 30.08.2011 at 14:36

Written by Doc G. on 29.08.2011 at 22:12

Also A7X is largely an amalgamation of the most easily digestible aspects of Metallica and Guns N Roses. That's why it's hard to view it as anything but a cash grab.

I'm not a fan of the music either, however I must repeat myself. Maybe A7X like Metallica and GnR and wanted to merge the sounds together. Maybe thats just the style of music they like to play. It does not mean its a cash grab. I think if I was into that style of music, I'd make something similar just because I like the sound of the music.


That is spot on of what I was trying to say. YES, their music does make money. However, maybe that's the music they like. What if in some other dimension, everyone loves raw black metal, and all these kvlt bands here are rockstars there, and get called sellouts, while a7x are unpopular, and are therefore considered to be doing it only for the love of the music.

Does the style of music that society loves really determine if a band is making music to make music, or for money? I find that incredibly shallow, and a simplistic view on a set of musician's personal goals and values. In addition to being offensive to their fans, saying that they are simply crowds of consumers mindlessly buying what sounds nice. Personally, my a7x CD's get played just as much as my death metal and thrash metal stuff.

I said seems like a cash-grab. Though I still stand my opinion that a lot of their music is written to be sold, I can't state (well, no one can) with 100% certainty what their true motivations are. However, the fact that they fail to create anything of their own, rather sticking to the tried-but-true derivative, accessible formula that's been shown to make money (previously by other bands) argues in favour of the pessimists.
----
"I got a lot of really good ideas, problem is, most of them suck."
- George Carlin
Loading...
28.11.2011 - 20:31
metalheadpunk
Account deleted
Alright there has been alot of shit said that i agree with and dont agree with as well. I hate alot of types of music, but ive listened to pretty much every kind out there, and metal to me takes the most talent and skill and has the most heart in it. The thing with "mainstream" shit like rap and hip hop like Zealot644 said is that when a new song comes out by one of these "artists" its a fucking popular hit for about two weeks if that then no one ever listens to it after that. Those people do this shit to make money hell everyone does, but in metal, the musicians make songs to last a life time, and they do. Now metal isnt the only music genre i like. I do like classical, some pop, rock, and i also love punk. There are good musicians in every aspect of music, but metal just gets it for me. I grew up on metal. I was about 7 or 8 years old when i started listening to it and it stuck. There is for a fact way more talent in metal, not every band has talent though i will admit. But shit, all rappers do is pretty much rhyme words and use a syntheziser on their voice, plus all the beats are made with a computer. Now a fucking 4 year old can rhyme okay. Id like to see any of those "artists" play a guitar at 240 beats per minute and sing at the same time. Metal IS the greatest music ever. Period.
Loading...
28.11.2011 - 20:37
Troy Killjoy
perfunctionist
I'd like to see Varg beat Eminem in a rap battle. Everyone has their talents, and stating that rappers "pretty much rhyme words and use a syntheziser on their voice, plus all the beats are made with a computer". Wow. Can you say ignorant.
----
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something."
Loading...
28.11.2011 - 20:55
Doc G.
Full Grown Hoser
Written by Guest on 28.11.2011 at 20:31

Alright there has been alot of shit said that i agree with and dont agree with as well. I hate alot of types of music, but ive listened to pretty much every kind out there, and metal to me takes the most talent and skill and has the most heart in it. The thing with "mainstream" shit like rap and hip hop like Zealot644 said is that when a new song comes out by one of these "artists" its a fucking popular hit for about two weeks if that then no one ever listens to it after that. Those people do this shit to make money hell everyone does, but in metal, the musicians make songs to last a life time, and they do. Now metal isnt the only music genre i like. I do like classical, some pop, rock, and i also love punk. There are good musicians in every aspect of music, but metal just gets it for me. I grew up on metal. I was about 7 or 8 years old when i started listening to it and it stuck. There is for a fact way more talent in metal, not every band has talent though i will admit. But shit, all rappers do is pretty much rhyme words and use a syntheziser on their voice, plus all the beats are made with a computer. Now a fucking 4 year old can rhyme okay. Id like to see any of those "artists" play a guitar at 240 beats per minute and sing at the same time. Metal IS the greatest music ever. Period.

Cool story bro. Perhaps you'd also consider focusing on more than just pop radio material? Nah, that would mean admitting perhaps rap does take some skill. It's like any other genre; you're not going to hear the good shit on the radio. It's like someone hearing Disturbed or Godsmack and thinking that's what metal is. There's a lot of incredibly skilled rap out there; Immortal Technique is pretty decent, I've also been listening to a lot of KRS-One recently. It's more socially conscious than what you hear on the radio.

Also, regarding those 240 beats per minute? Anyone hear of triggers? I think you'll be disappointed by how many of those supposedly lightning-fast drummers use them. In fact, more do than don't these days.

As Troy says; put Varg in a rap battle.
----
"I got a lot of really good ideas, problem is, most of them suck."
- George Carlin
Loading...
28.11.2011 - 23:07
Slayer666

Written by Guest on 28.11.2011 at 20:31

rant


Yo dawg! I heard you like elitism, so we put some elitism in your metal so you can be a misguided elitist while being a tr00 metalhead.

I'm just kidding, I think there should be more people like you here. Rise, brothers elitists, RISE!
Loading...