wondering if jackson guitars are indeed THAT GOOD. reason why i ask is coz i bought this guitar on tuesday(today is thursday) that is a les paul with a floyd rose on. beautiful guitar, but since its a les paul, and i'm used to a strat, or similar guitars, i'm haveing a hard time fucking around with it. the rhythm is fine, but the solos are really slopy on em.

so i was thinking of returning the guitar(has to be before tuesday of next week!) and getting something else. i found a Jackson guitar, and i'm pretty sure it was a dinky(or could have been a soloist) guitar(but i could be wrong) and i was surprised coz the guitar was MUCH CHEAPER than i expected. the store was selling it for 500 canadian bucks.


now, i honestly dont know a whole lot about jackson guitars, other than how 'devine' they are, and how expensive they are....unless the dinky/soloist are supposedly jackson's cheaper make? like Fender made a stratocaster. you can find a fender for a 1000 bucks, or you can find a fender strat for 200 bucks.



but yeah, should i go for it? i cant remember which one it was, but it looked something like either:

the soloist(including the body art)


or the dinky(excluding the body art)


and the guitar i have now is this one: