Valaskjalf Account deleted |
Valaskjalf Account deleted
Stop whining..and what ur saying is rubbish anyway...ur basing this purely on your sour grapes that Alvestam left. They havent declined musically...
For any of those who want a diplomatic version of what the album is actually like check
http://www.metalstorm.ee/pub/review.php?review_id=7256
Loading...
|
HBrandr Account deleted |
HBrandr Account deleted
Interesting... just a day after my review on Dark Matter Dimensions and you're opinion is the complete opposite. The album is in no way 'over produced' - how can you even compare that to a Static-X record?? Glad I wouldn't know how they compare.
The only thing a little flawed with this record is the vocal melodies, the instruments sound like their past material and in no way resembles 'Gothenburg Metal' - everything heavy and melodic from Sweden doesn't automatically make it a charateristic of 'Gothenburg Metal'.
These 11 songs are full of engergy and if you want to listen to Christian Älvestam's voice, go listen to their first three records - this album is not bad at all!
Loading...
|
Marcel Hubregtse Grumpy Old Fuck ElitePosts: 40071 |
Great review, I absolutely agree with every single point made. Especially on the point of it being over produced. This one is so slick sounding that all dynamics and possible rough edges have gone.
----
Member of the true crusade against European Flower Metal
Yesterday is dead and gone, tomorrow is out of sight
Dawn Crosby (r.i.p.)
05.04.1963 - 15.12.1996
Loading...
|
HBrandr Account deleted |
HBrandr Account deleted
'Great review, I absolutely agree with every single point made. Especially on the point of it being over produced. This one is so slick sounding that all dynamics and possible rough edges have gone. '
Great review? 'The music is boring', 'The great catchy melodies that used to fill their past records are gone'.... not really informed, the melodies are so evident on this record it's not even funny.
What's the problem with slick production if the sound compliments their music? Use the top notch equipment and sound modules - why not?! It doesn't have to sound more 'rough around the edges'... that's just a matter of opinion and obviously the sound you like.
You either like Scar Symmetry or you don't... the music hasn't changed much at all, it's just better produced and now there are two vocalists instead of one - and only the vocals sections have changed... if you had Älvestam singing on this album I'm sure everyone's opinion would be different.
Holographic Universe and Pitch Black Progress was different to their first record, but their was no objections then...
Loading...
|
Lucas Mr. Noise ElitePosts: 13427 |
LucasMr. NoiseElitePosts: 13427
Written by Guest on 20.10.2009 at 22:13
Great review? 'The music is boring', 'The great catchy melodies that used to fill their past records are gone'.... not really informed, it's so evident on the record it's not even funny.
What's the problem with the production if the sound compliments their music? It doesn't have to sound more 'rough'... that's just a matter of opinion, also that makes this album a little different from the other three.
You either like Scar Symmetry (because of Älvestam) or you don't... the music hasn't changed much at all, it's just better produced and now there is two vocalists instead of one.
And if you don't like Scar Symmetry (or just dont like this album), why not write a review about it?
----
SLUDGE. DOOM. DEATH. Wait, what?
"The reason I'm running for president is because I can't be Bruce Springsteen." - Barack Obama
Loading...
|
Marcel Hubregtse Grumpy Old Fuck ElitePosts: 40071 |
Written by Guest on 20.10.2009 at 22:13
'Great review, I absolutely agree with every single point made. Especially on the point of it being over produced. This one is so slick sounding that all dynamics and possible rough edges have gone. '
Great review? 'The music is boring', 'The great catchy melodies that used to fill their past records are gone'.... not really informed, the melodies are so evident on this record it's not even funny.
What's the problem with slick production if the sound compliments their music? Use the top notch equipment and sound modules - why not?! It doesn't have to sound more 'rough around the edges'... that's just a matter of opinion and obviously the sound you like.
You either like Scar Symmetry or you don't... the music hasn't changed much at all, it's just better produced and now there are two vocalists instead of one - and only the vocals sections have changed... if you had Älvestam singing on this album I'm sure everyone's opinion would be different.
Holographic Universe and Pitch Black Progress was different to their first record, but their was no objections then...
Imo the so-caleld better production (in fact the slicker production) doesn't compliment the music at all. It takes away the little bite the music used to have. So in this case the production is actually worse. The music has tchanged quite a bit now it is almost pure pop due to the slick production and also the music itself. This suffers from the same disase 95% of Euro Power Metal bands suffer from.
----
Member of the true crusade against European Flower Metal
Yesterday is dead and gone, tomorrow is out of sight
Dawn Crosby (r.i.p.)
05.04.1963 - 15.12.1996
Loading...
|
HBrandr Account deleted |
HBrandr Account deleted
Written by Lucas on 20.10.2009 at 22:18
Written by Guest on 20.10.2009 at 22:13
Great review? 'The music is boring', 'The great catchy melodies that used to fill their past records are gone'.... not really informed, it's so evident on the record it's not even funny.
What's the problem with the production if the sound compliments their music? It doesn't have to sound more 'rough'... that's just a matter of opinion, also that makes this album a little different from the other three.
You either like Scar Symmetry (because of Älvestam) or you don't... the music hasn't changed much at all, it's just better produced and now there is two vocalists instead of one.
And if you don't like Scar Symmetry (or just dont like this album), why not write a review about it?
You're assuming I said that... write a review if you want to, just don't make comparisons you can't back up - like saying the drummer sounds like a wannabee Mike Portnoy - what's your evidence for that? Or the catchy melodies are gone... they are even more 'in your face' this time around.
Loading...
|
BitterCOld The Ancient One AdminPosts: 15250 |
Dane, you emo jesus freak, you're just pissed because the Christian is out of the band.
Loading...
|
Valaskjalf Account deleted |
Valaskjalf Account deleted
Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 20.10.2009 at 22:23
Imo the so-caleld better production (in fact the slicker production) doesn't compliment the music at all. It takes away the little bite the music used to have. So in this case the production is actually worse. The music has tchanged quite a bit now it is almost pure pop due to the slick production and also the music itself. This suffers from the same disase 95% of Euro Power Metal bands suffer from.
To be honest Marcel, you have very little good to say about anything that doesnt depress the listener into the ground - so why on EARTH would you even comment on Scar Symmetry? We all know you will hang on the slightest thing to slag a band off, even when it comes down to production, especially if its powermetal or melodic death. This isnt 1990 anymore, so all the bands from the past with the productions which had "bite" probably sounded that way because they had no other option...today we have another name for those productions ... its called "shitty".
I swear if it was up to you everything on this forum would be Doom Metal...because obviously everything else is over-produced, pop or gay. Did it ever occur to you that not everyone in the metal world wants music to sound as if it was recorded 20 years go? Sheesh man....
Loading...
|
HBrandr Account deleted |
HBrandr Account deleted
My review got deleted because it was post to early... nice - what's the point in re-posting it in 3 months. How come if one registers you're still seen as a 'guest'?
Loading...
|
Lucas Mr. Noise ElitePosts: 13427 |
LucasMr. NoiseElitePosts: 13427
Written by Guest on 20.10.2009 at 23:09
My review got deleted because it was post to early... nice - what's the point in re-posting it in 3 months. How come if one registers you're still seen as a 'guest'?
There's a difference between guests on the website and guest reviewers. The difference is that when you register on the website, you're a user. With all the rights and duties that an user has. Becoming a reviewer is an entirely different thing, though. You have to be part of the Staff (or Elite) to be an official reviewer. When you're an official reviewer you also work with labels etc. You can only become an official reviewer if you've delivered a lot of consistantly good reviews, and we have room for you in the team. We'll ask you in that case.
We have the three months waiting period to give the official reviewers (me, for example) the time to review it first. It's a basic rule. Your review was accepted by mistake, it has nothing to do with the fact a different-minded review of a Staff member was published.
----
SLUDGE. DOOM. DEATH. Wait, what?
"The reason I'm running for president is because I can't be Bruce Springsteen." - Barack Obama
Loading...
|
Baz Anderson StaffPosts: 13237 |
Are you two related or something?
Both apparently from South Africa, similar avatars...
Loading...
|
HBrandr Account deleted |
HBrandr Account deleted
Written by Baz Anderson on 20.10.2009 at 23:15
Are you two related or something?
Both apparently from South Africa, similar avatars...
No, we know each other fairly well - the avatars are just a coincidence though.
Loading...
|
HBrandr Account deleted |
HBrandr Account deleted
Written by Lucas on 20.10.2009 at 23:14
Written by Guest on 20.10.2009 at 23:09
My review got deleted because it was post to early... nice - what's the point in re-posting it in 3 months. How come if one registers you're still seen as a 'guest'?
There's a difference between guests on the website and guest reviewers. The difference is that when you register on the website, you're a user. With all the rights and duties that an user has. Becoming a reviewer is an entirely different thing, though. You have to be part of the Staff (or Elite) to be an official reviewer. When you're an official reviewer you also work with labels etc. You can only become an official reviewer if you've delivered a lot of consistantly good reviews, and we have room for you in the team. We'll ask you in that case.
We have the three months waiting period to give the official reviewers (me, for example) the time to review it first. It's a basic rule. Your review was accepted by mistake, it has nothing to do with the fact a different-minded review of a Staff member was published.
Ok, was just curious - thanks for clearing that up, Lucas.
Loading...
|
Marcel Hubregtse Grumpy Old Fuck ElitePosts: 40071 |
Written by Guest on 20.10.2009 at 23:00
Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 20.10.2009 at 22:23
Imo the so-caleld better production (in fact the slicker production) doesn't compliment the music at all. It takes away the little bite the music used to have. So in this case the production is actually worse. The music has tchanged quite a bit now it is almost pure pop due to the slick production and also the music itself. This suffers from the same disase 95% of Euro Power Metal bands suffer from.
To be honest Marcel, you have very little good to say about anything that doesnt depress the listener into the ground - so why on EARTH would you even comment on Scar Symmetry? We all know you will hang on the slightest thing to slag a band off, even when it comes down to production, especially if its powermetal or melodic death. This isnt 1990 anymore, so all the bands from the past with the productions which had "bite" probably sounded that way because they had no other option...today we have another name for those productions ... its called "shitty".
I swear if it was up to you everything on this forum would be Doom Metal...because obviously everything else is over-produced, pop or gay. Did it ever occur to you that not everyone in the metal world wants music to sound as if it was recorded 20 years go? Sheesh man....
Slagging off Euro Power Metal, yes, in 99% of the cases. Slagging off Melodic Death? When it comes to true melodic death (so actual death metal that is melodic) no. Btw, I like the the older stuff Scar Symmetry released. And sorry to say but this isn't melodic death metal at all, there is nto a hint of death metal in its sound. Gothenburg this is, not melodic death metal. But then again most people into metal think Arch Enemy is also melodic death metal.
And no not everything has sound like ti was recorded 20 years ago. Modern day Dark Tranquillity sounds modern but there the production complements the music. And I love both odl Dark Tranquillity when they were still melodic death metal but also modern day Gothenburg DT. I also LOVE both new and old In Flames, same goes for Soilwork fyi.
----
Member of the true crusade against European Flower Metal
Yesterday is dead and gone, tomorrow is out of sight
Dawn Crosby (r.i.p.)
05.04.1963 - 15.12.1996
Loading...
|
Valaskjalf Account deleted |
Valaskjalf Account deleted
Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 20.10.2009 at 23:35
Written by Guest on 20.10.2009 at 23:00
Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 20.10.2009 at 22:23
Imo the so-caleld better production (in fact the slicker production) doesn't compliment the music at all. It takes away the little bite the music used to have. So in this case the production is actually worse. The music has tchanged quite a bit now it is almost pure pop due to the slick production and also the music itself. This suffers from the same disase 95% of Euro Power Metal bands suffer from.
To be honest Marcel, you have very little good to say about anything that doesnt depress the listener into the ground - so why on EARTH would you even comment on Scar Symmetry? We all know you will hang on the slightest thing to slag a band off, even when it comes down to production, especially if its powermetal or melodic death. This isnt 1990 anymore, so all the bands from the past with the productions which had "bite" probably sounded that way because they had no other option...today we have another name for those productions ... its called "shitty".
I swear if it was up to you everything on this forum would be Doom Metal...because obviously everything else is over-produced, pop or gay. Did it ever occur to you that not everyone in the metal world wants music to sound as if it was recorded 20 years go? Sheesh man....
Slagging off Euro Power Metal, yes, in 99% of the cases. Slagging off Melodic Death? When it comes to true melodic death (so actual death metal that is melodic) no. Btw, I like the the older stuff Scar Symmetry released. And sorry to say but this isn't melodic death metal at all, there is nto a hint of death metal in its sound. Gothenburg this is, not melodic death metal. But then again most people into metal think Arch Enemy is also melodic death metal.
And no not everything has sound like ti was recorded 20 years ago. Modern day Dark Tranquillity sounds modern but there the production complements the music. And I love both odl Dark Tranquillity when they were still melodic death metal but also modern day Gothenburg DT. I also LOVE both new and old In Flames, same goes for Soilwork fyi.
Hmmm...an epiphany on my side if there ever was one - it does leave me curious, when you say NEW Soilwork, how on earth can you think that is better the new Scar Symmetry? lol Its pretty much just showing off Bjorn Strid as a single God-like entity within the band and they have become extremely "thin". Sort of perplexing this.
Loading...
|
Thanntos
Posts: 124 |
Sorry Marcel but everything past Clayman by In Flames blows massively. A couple decent songs on Come Clarity but otherwise, In Flames was done for me after Clayman.
----
I will kill you so hard you will die to death.
Loading...
|
Valaskjalf Account deleted |
Valaskjalf Account deleted
Written by Thanntos on 21.10.2009 at 00:39
Sorry Marcel but everything past Clayman by In Flames blows massively. A couple decent songs on Come Clarity but otherwise, In Flames was done for me after Clayman.
Yeah, im still in shock from reading that he likes In Flames' new stuff....thats like actually standing outside and checking out the flying pigs. Makes the remark about how shit SS has become even more bazaar - I mean if you want metal-turn-pop then In Flames is the first band id jump at, rather than SS
Loading...
|
MetalManic
Posts: 624 |
21.10.2009 - 05:50Rating: 7
STAFF VS. READERS
Loading...
|
VanHelsing
Posts: 69 |
21.10.2009 - 06:09Rating: 6
Well I thought it was pretty decent but yeah the vocal melodies are lacking and there's definitely something missing from this album vs the previous stuff Scar Symmetry released.
However, being the first album with the new vocalists, I think it's a pretty decent release... I mean, the music still has that Scar Symmetry trademark so eventhough I won't listen to this as much as Pitch Black Progress or Holographic Universe, they did a good job with this.
As a side note... did anyone else hated Robert Karlsson's "menacing look" in every single scene of the "Noumenon and Phenomenon" video?
----
-V
Loading...
|
Locke Account deleted |
Locke Account deleted
The new vocalists are fine you whiners. The death vox are indifuckingstinguishable and the clean vox, while certainly different, are well done nonetheless. Are they better than Alvestam? Certainly not, he's one of the best vocalists in metal today, that's not an easy thing to top though so cut them some slack. Is the album better than their previous work? Probably not. But that doesn't mean that this isn't a quality slab of modern melodic death metal. Come back when you can raise a criticism more valid than "bawwww Alvestem is teh gone". This is a Blabbermouth-tier review.
Loading...
|
bluemobiusx Account deleted |
bluemobiusx Account deleted
I think this album is a step down for Scar Symmetry. Not that the musicians on the album aren't talented. The instruments are technical enough and performed well, but the music isn't that great when it's all put together. The band did not do anything new or mind blowing with this album. The feeling I get from this album when it's over is, "Hmm, time to put Holographic Universe back into the CD player." And listen, all you people who are saying something along the lines of "you're just crying cause Alvestam is gone" are being onesided. Look at the big picture, Christian was one of the reasons a lot of people liked the band. Sure the music is amazing, but so were his vocals. Their amazing music combined with vocals of any less quality than his is an injustice to the music. Who really thinks Iron Maiden was better when Dickenson quit in the 90s? I would be more happy with this album and the band as a whole if the vocalists could atleast match the quality of Alvestam's vocals.
Loading...
|
Visioneerie Urban Monster
Posts: 810 |
Written by BitterCOld on 20.10.2009 at 22:59
Dane, you emo jesus freak, you're just pissed because the Christian is out of the band.
Nicely said, this is what I call a valid statement.
----
Any man can stand adversity, but to test his character give him power - A. Lincoln
Loading...
|
Wes
Posts: 423 |
21.10.2009 - 08:24Rating: 5
I agree, terrible album makes me so sad
Loading...
|
Crème fraiche
Posts: 695 |
Damn this review has really pissed people off!
To be honest I haven't heard SS until this release, and I liked it. I could do without a lot of the clean vocals though. The harsh vocals I liked, and same with the guitar melodies.
Loading...
|
BudDa ElitePosts: 887 |
I always thought Scar Symmetry was beta off as an all out growl band. I didn't like Christian's clean vocals and now that they have gone out and gotten another 'clean' vocalist. I don't think I'll like this album much
----
Freeze! Step away from the hubris.
Loading...
|
Silent Creeper Senile Veteran
Posts: 296 |
21.10.2009 - 11:03Rating: 6
I would rate it with 6.5 maybe a bit less... Nothing new but also not that bad... Mediocre would be the best word I guess...
Loading...
|
tea[m]ster Au Pays Natal ContributorPosts: 5245 |
21.10.2009 - 12:02Rating: 7
Written by Guest on 20.10.2009 at 23:00
Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 20.10.2009 at 22:23
To be honest Marcel, you have very little good to say about anything that doesnt depress the listener into the ground - so why on EARTH would you even comment on Scar Symmetry? We all know you will hang on the slightest thing to slag a band off, even when it comes down to production, especially if its powermetal or melodic death. This isnt 1990 anymore, so all the bands from the past with the productions which had "bite" probably sounded that way because they had no other option...today we have another name for those productions ... its called "shitty".
I swear if it was up to you everything on this forum would be Doom Metal...because obviously everything else is over-produced, pop or gay. Did it ever occur to you that not everyone in the metal world wants music to sound as if it was recorded 20 years go? Sheesh man....
Flucking EPIC!!
I'm pretty new to this website but I noticed that about Marcel too - "if it ain't a funeral portrait then I don't like it!"
----
Loading...
|
Marcel Hubregtse Grumpy Old Fuck ElitePosts: 40071 |
Written by tea[m]ster on 21.10.2009 at 12:02
Written by Guest on 20.10.2009 at 23:00
Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 20.10.2009 at 22:23
To be honest Marcel, you have very little good to say about anything that doesnt depress the listener into the ground - so why on EARTH would you even comment on Scar Symmetry? We all know you will hang on the slightest thing to slag a band off, even when it comes down to production, especially if its powermetal or melodic death. This isnt 1990 anymore, so all the bands from the past with the productions which had "bite" probably sounded that way because they had no other option...today we have another name for those productions ... its called "shitty".
I swear if it was up to you everything on this forum would be Doom Metal...because obviously everything else is over-produced, pop or gay. Did it ever occur to you that not everyone in the metal world wants music to sound as if it was recorded 20 years go? Sheesh man....
Flucking EPIC!!
I'm pretty new to this website but I noticed that about Marcel too - "if it ain't a funeral portrait then I don't like it!"
If you people read the fourum more closely you will all see that I only dislike Euroe Flower Power Metal, female fronted metal (which some call gothic metal) and true gothic metal PLus of course all opverporduced metal which sounds like pop.
----
Member of the true crusade against European Flower Metal
Yesterday is dead and gone, tomorrow is out of sight
Dawn Crosby (r.i.p.)
05.04.1963 - 15.12.1996
Loading...
|
neonxaos
Posts: 163
|
What a thread.
Dane, you have your opinions, fair enough, but I have mine as well.
I think Scar Symmetry have done well with this one, all things considered. The new vocalists are not on par with Älvestam, no, but they're different, and I can definitely live with them. Also, I never did understand the notion that good production = bad metal. I wish that Metallica hadn't recorded their early albums using a cassette tape recorder placed inside a bucket full of wool, for instance, because their songs just sound infinitely better live. Having said that, I feel that Dark Matter Dimensions is actually a more raw and chaotic production than the previous efforts by Scar Symmetry, and I may actually grow to like it better in the long run, compared to their earlier work, which is so instantly catchy. The musicianship on display here is also still at an incredible technical level, and I have to say that this also goes a long way for me.
I give the new album an 8.0
Loading...
|