|
|
Written by Cynic Metalhead on 01.05.2012 at 07:59
The problem is that this list is very common and boring.
If I wanted to be interesting, the list would have include many new and underground bands. But my purpose is to point the most valuable in the metal history - the Masterpieces. Therefore, the presence of classical groups is necessary and justified. Also - the old band's music is known art, but of such a kind that it cannot be surpassed by any later metal pieces, precisely because it is not form but SPIRIT. As we find it hard to part from the first spring days and pass into the season of full unfolding and ripening, so we tear ourselves almost regretfully away from this known and "boring" art, with its buds full of the coming wealth of IDEAS and forms, in order to see what ultimately became of it. In metal music, as in everything else, is not all unfolding and ripening a kind of withering, since in the full bloom we no longer have truth and reality appealing to us with that mysterious directness that is more magically eloquent than even perfection itself  ?
And again - my list contains and several almost unknown bands  |
|
|
|
| Masterpieces aren't the only stuffs which have evolved way back and having a consequences on the new bands. What Metallica, Slayer, Anthrax, Sabbath, Maiden, DT, Ozzy, Opeth, DT and many more classical metal bands did have a impact on new generation of Metal bands but classifying only them and saying " precisely because it is not form but SPIRIT" is utter biased. There are loads of masterpieces new generations( including underground) bands existing and will exist that will have their own influential way of defining history. 80's scene came and went drastically so do the 90's and 00's but this is 2012 and will follow up till the World ends, bands will come and gone by leaving their precious history with the fans all over the world. Like yesterday? Motorhead and Big 4 Tomorrow? Ensiferum, Insominium, Ahab and Future? um will wait and lets see. |
|
|
|
Written by Cynic Metalhead on 01.05.2012 at 11:04
... There are loads of masterpieces new generations( including underground) bands existing and will exist that will have their own influential way of defining history ... this is 2012 and will follow up till the World ends, bands will come and gone by leaving their precious history with the fans all over the world ... Ensiferum, Insominium, Ahab and Future? um will wait and lets see.
Time will sort finest albums. Today is always biased … |
|
|
|
| We are in today era so we have to deal with that only. |
|
|
|
Written by Cynic Metalhead on 01.05.2012 at 15:27
We are in today era so we have to deal with that only.
We must not forget that albums from the 80s and 90s are the foundations of modern metal music - the rhythmical schemes, vocal lines, the riffs of main styles, lyrical themes, image of the musicians ... Many young fans have heard only names of the albums, but they haven't listened to these records.
If you want a good assessment of The Present, you must listen the masterpieces of The Past |
|
|
|
It's a waste of my time to browse this list.
Certainly it's a Black Sabbath fan boy's list.
Yes, Black Sabbath is the most overrated Metal band in the universe ! |
|
|
|
Written by God Buster 鬼 on 22.03.2014 at 07:48
Yes, Black Sabbath is the most overrated Metal band in the universe !
You might not like their sound but you can't deny the influence they've had on the metal scene even now. |
|
|
|
Written by Troy Killjoy on 22.03.2014 at 07:53
Written by God Buster 鬼 on 22.03.2014 at 07:48
Yes, Black Sabbath is the most overrated Metal band in the universe !
You might not like their sound but you can't deny the influence they've had on the metal scene even now.
Ozzy's vocals sound unique, no one can copy that.
A lot of people though he could not sing, it's actually a biggest overlooked, his vocals are flawless but Black Sabbath songs' composition are too simple. Today we can name it - "commercial" (which did not widely be used in the 70's - 80's).
Even nowadays none of any Judas Priest's album gives me that "cheesy feelings", so Black Sabbath can be regarded as today's Bon Jovi in the 70's and Judas Priest is still immortal.
As for the influence...they are only a copy cat, a rip-off of Coven, almost 85% similar !
Their fame came from the supports from the label - Advertisement & Publicity.
I mean They "Buy" Their Fans ! |
|
|
|
| I think it's probably safer if we just agree to disagree. |
|
|
|
Written by Troy Killjoy on 22.03.2014 at 16:12
I think it's probably safer if we just agree to disagree.
The best course of action when dealing with someone who thinks Bloodbath are an experimental death metal band. |
|
|
|
Written by !J.O.O.E.! on 22.03.2014 at 16:25
The best course of action when dealing with someone who thinks Bloodbath are an experimental death metal band.
Same guy? Could have saved me from responding in the first place had I known that.  |
|
|
|
Written by God Buster 鬼 on 22.03.2014 at 08:20
... Black Sabbath songs' composition are too simple. Today we can name it - "commercial"
Simplicity is not always a disadvantage In the case of early Black Sabbath the simplicity is a sign of genius ... |
|
|
|
Written by !J.O.O.E.! on 22.03.2014 at 16:25
Written by Troy Killjoy on 22.03.2014 at 16:12
I think it's probably safer if we just agree to disagree.
The best course of action when dealing with someone who thinks Bloodbath are an experimental death metal band.
Canadian Alliance (Red-Hair Punk Kid + Home Alone Caveman) showed their close cooperation ! |
|
|
|
Written by God Buster 鬼 on 23.03.2014 at 06:19
Canadian Alliance (Red-Hair Punk Kid + Home Alone Caveman) showed their close cooperation !
Yes, we're called the common-sense brigade. |
|
|
|
If you want to post comments, you can discuss the selection or the ranking.
I don't want petty bickering. Please ... |
|
|
|
I like this list!
Written by Cynic Metalhead on 01.05.2012 at 11:04
Tomorrow? Ensiferum, Insominium, Ahab and Future? um will wait and lets see.
Probably not.
Today thanks to the Internet and development of a lot more genres the scene is far more fragmented.
It was a lot easier to have classics when everyone was listening to roughly the same thing. Now the music is too diverse to develop consensus. |
|
|
|
Can we call Ozzy Osbourne, AC/DC and Van Halen - Metal ?
Could it be better to categorise this way :
Ozzy Osbourne - Heavy Hard Rock
AC/DC - Heavy Blues Rock
Van Halen - Hard Rock |
|
|
|
Written by God Buster 鬼 on 30.04.2014 at 20:56
Can we call Ozzy Osbourne, AC/DC and Van Halen - Metal ?
Could it be better to categorise this way :
Ozzy Osbourne - Heavy Hard Rock
AC/DC - Heavy Blues Rock
Van Halen - Hard Rock
Actually your definition about these musicians is right ... but my list includes concrete albums (for me - metal).
The genre categorization is very relative thing. My personal understanding about Metal isn't limited to the burden and aggression of the sound. Metal has specific Spirit. I recognize that Spirit in each of these five albums. |
|
Advertise on Metal Storm
|
